Today's editor brings you some interesting stories. Welcome to read the comments.
Nowadays people have different views on the first emperor of Qin, but most people have different views on the first emperor of Qin. In history, it must be very rare to be able to compete with the first emperor of Qin. Perhaps only those emperors who unified the great chaos could be compared with the first emperor of Qin. In the course of Qin Shihuang's conquest of the world, many people appeared to assist him.
These include, and so on. All in all, these made great contributions to the unification of the first emperor of Qin and the six kingdoms. There has always been a mystery about Qin Shihuang, whether he is LV Buwei's child or not. This problem has puzzled people for more than two thousand years. Up to now, there are still controversies about it.
Although there is no coffin to cover the outcome of the debate, in the long history, the life experience of the first emperor of Qin is becoming more and more strange. Many novels, operas and so on have been adapted, which makes people more curious about Qin Shihuang's life experience. First of all, it can be inferred from Qin Shihuang's DNA, but it is not excavated.
Therefore, it is impossible to determine the DNA of Qin Shihuang. However, although there is no DNA of Qin Shihuang, it can be completely proved that Qin Shihuang is the son of LV Buwei through the inference of modern medicine. The earliest Qin Shihuang is the child of LV Buwei, and it's spread from the historical records that "Lv Buwei took Zhuji in Handan, who was a good dancer and resident, and knew his body..."
But in the records, there is "Prince Qin Zhuangxiang". Isn't this a contradiction? Now it seems that such records must have a purpose. The mistakes of Sima Qian's records directly made later generations doubt the life experience of Qin Shihuang. According to the current medical inference, Qin Shihuang must not be Lu Buwei's child.
In ancient times, there was a lack of medical knowledge, but not a lack of understanding. It is recorded in historical records that "Ji hid herself, and at the time of the great age, she gave birth to a son. So she became his wife. " The term "big term" here refers to 12 months. This is a serious violation of physiological common sense. But why did Sima Qian write like this? There must be a purpose in it.
For example, Yao was born 14 months pregnant, followed by Emperor Zhao 14 months pregnant. This is unbelievable. Such records are against common sense. Sima Qian said that it must have a purpose to be pregnant for 12 months. Now it seems that normal delivery or premature delivery, certainly can not be related to LV Buwei.
Therefore, pregnancy must be prolonged, in such a case, Zhao Ji will be related to LV Buwei. Today's medicine has proved that the time of pregnancy is generally 10 months, and those who are more than 10 months pregnant do not give birth, which is very easy to cause dystocia. Even now, it is impossible to be pregnant for more than 11 months, otherwise the pregnant woman will be in danger of life.
So there must be a reason why Sima Qian recorded this. It is the underdevelopment of ancient medicine that led to the phenomenon of "false pregnancy". The modern gynecology clinical early has "the false pregnancy" one said, this is because some women are looking forward to have the child, causes the mood to be excited. I mistakenly thought I was pregnant. The excessive fluctuation of emotion makes the function of hypothalamus and hypophysis disordered, and amenorrhea will be caused in serious cases.
Therefore, Zhao Ji's 12-month pregnancy is also the sum of the number of "false pregnancy" months and the number of normal pregnancy months, so it seems that Zhao Ji's time of childbearing has nothing to do with LV Buwei. Sima Qiandi suggested that Zhao Ji had failed to write completely before she married. In other words, Sima Qian is not a medical expert himself, and he is certainly not clear about the pregnancy of women.
Disclaimer: the above content comes from the Internet, and the copyright belongs to the original author. If you violate your original copyright, please let us know, and we will delete the relevant content as soon as possible.